What I could gather from the news:
- Ad watchers had appealed to consumer court claiming fraud by HUL.
- HUL agreed that some language in the ad could be misleading and decided to pull the ad out and change the packaging.
- The basic claim is that the batches that contained gold coins were out much before (manufactured before 22 Nov/10 Dec 2009) and currently running ad-campaign says that offer is valid for soaps manufactued between 5 Oct 2009 and 20 Jan 2010.
- Appeal has been made for 2.5 Crore penalty for misleading.
So many interesting things here -
- Win for consumer awareness
- How can HUL dare to violate a law, that too in marketing itself?
- Why is there so little reporting on news sites or blogs (The reason I am putting it up here)?
- Why does it take day and half more for other news sites to investigate a decently important story? Are there vested interests (unlikely that so many are together)? Or is it delay in indexing from google (again, unlikely)?
3 comments:
I think there are vested interests here. I briefly mentioned it to a friend at HUL and he was fully aware of the situation.
seems so... and try to google it - no one is reporting it still.
talk about freedom of press. everyone has freedom to shut up it seems.
Post a Comment